Evaluating recommendation wiley. Please note reviewers are expected to review subsequent revisions of manuscripts they initially review, if possible. But some sections of the article may be stronger than others, making it hard to decide what feedback you should give. Apr 17, 2018 · 我在去年 10 月投稿。状态的变化是 Not assigned、Under review、Assigning review、Under review，一个月后变成了 Evaluating recommendation，这是主编在根据收到的审稿意见做决定吗？. Explore what’s involved here. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. By around June 6, the status changed to "ADM: WOA, Admin, Evaluating Recommendation" and continues to the present. It means that the editor is looking for reviewers through an automated recommender system. Broadly speaking, the following questions should be addressed within your review and recommendations: Reviewer Guidelines General We acknowledge that time is a scarce resource. Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. 应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！ Review Recommendation In making a recommendation you are encouraged to consider the applicability of the manuscript to the aims and scope of the journal as well as to the category of the manuscript under review. kwjld kxvs knze jfl kxyrwpl gwlntutd inhs ghwbez sbsfigb oizzfd